EPD-IES-0035125:001

Granab subfloor system - Z Steel

Granab subfloor systems are used in homes, offices, schools and public buildings: they are constructed with non-deformable galvanised steel floor girders and an effective sound-dampening resilient suspension system. The subfloor system is secured to the subflooring and set at the desired height. Surface flooring made from chipboard and parquet or carpet is laid over the system.

General information

EPD OwnerBygg och Miljöteknik GRANAB AB
Registration numberEPD-IES-0035125:001
EPD typeEPD of a single product from a manufacturer/service provider
StatusValid
Version date2026-10-02
Validity date2031-10-02
Standards conformanceISO 14025:2006, EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021
Geographical scopeSweden
An EPD may be updated or depublished if conditions change. This is the latest version of the EPD.

Programme information

ProgrammeInternational EPD System
AddressEPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden
Websitewww.environdec.com
E-mailsupport@environdec.com

Product category rules

CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR)
Product Category Rules (PCR)2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (version 2.0.1) 2.0.1
PCR review was conducted byThe Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Rob Rouwette (chair), Noa Meron (co-chair). The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support.

Verification

Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via
Third-party verifierDavid Palm (Dalemarken AB)
Approved byThe International EPD® System
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.environdec.com.

Ownership and limitation on use of EPD

Limitations

EPDs within the same product category but published in different EPD programmes, may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same first-digit version number) or be based on fully aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have identical scope in terms of included life-cycle stages (unless the excluded life-cycle stage is demonstrated to be insignificant); apply identical impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); and be valid at the time of comparison.

Ownership

The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.

Information about EPD Owner

EPD OwnerBygg och Miljöteknik GRANAB AB
Contact person nameFredrik Blom
Contact person e-mailfredrik@granab.se
Organisation addressÅkerigatan 2 447 37 Vårgårda Sweden
LCA PractitionerMarta Herrero Alemany, marta.herrero.alemany@ivl.se elisabet.hallberg@ivl.se, elisabet.hallberg@ivl.se

Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner

GRANAB manufactures subfloor systems for homes, offices, schools and public buildings.

Organisation logo

Product information

Product nameGranab subfloor system - Z Steel
Product identificationNot applicable
Product descriptionGranab subfloor systems are used in homes, offices, schools and public buildings: they are constructed with non-deformable galvanised steel floor girders and an effective sound-dampening resilient suspension system. The subfloor system is secured to the subflooring and set at the desired height. Surface flooring made from chipboard and parquet or carpet is laid over the system.
Product information from external sourceshttps://www.granab.se/en/
Technical purpose of productTo provide an elevated floor structure with sound insulation and level adjustment capabilities in residential, commercial, educational and public buildings.
Manufacturing or service provision descriptionAssembly of the various components of the system.
Material propertiesArea density: 2.3 kg/m2 Thickness: 0.045 m
Area density:
2.3 kg/m2
Thickness:
0.045 m
Manufacturing siteGRANAB AB Granab Lidköping 531 53 Lidköping Sweden
UN CPC codeNo applicable UN CPC code
Geographical scopeSweden

Product images

Content declaration

Hazardous and toxic substancesThe product does not contain any substances from the SVHC candidate list in concentrations exceeding 0.1% of its weight.
Product content
Content nameMass, kgPost-consumer recycled material, mass-% of productBiogenic material, mass-% of productBiogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Galvanized steel1.996700
Polypropylene (PP)0.24000
Steel0.05000
Polyurethane (PUR)0.05000
Total2.336700
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2
Packaging materials
Material nameMass, kgMass-% (versus the product)Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit
Plastic packaging0.0090.40
Steel band0.0060.20
Wood based packaging0.0170.70.007
Corrugated board0.0050.20.002
Total0.0371.50.009
Note 11 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2

LCA information

EPD based on declared or functional unitDeclared unit
Declared unit and reference flow1 m2 of Granab subfloor System Area: 1 m2
Conversion factor to mass2.3
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes?
Datasources used for this EPDGaBi database (general) Sphera MLC (fka GaBi) Databases Edition 2026.1
LCA SoftwareLCA for Experts (formerly GaBi Software) N/A
Version of the EN 15804 reference packageEF Reference Package 3.1
Characterisation methodsEnvironmental indicators describing environmental impacts according to EN15804+A2, Version: EF 3.1 Optional indicators describing environmental impacts according to EN15804+A2, Version: EF 3.1 Resource use, waste and output flows
Technology description including background systemThe product considered is a steel subfloor system for homes, offices, schools and public buildings. It consists mainly of galvanized steel profiles (85% by weight), together with polypropylene support blocks, steel screws and polyurethane damping elements. The system is manufactured at Granab’s facilities in Lidköping, Sweden, using mainly electricity for assembly and processing. The main raw material is SSAB Zero™ galvanized steel produced from recycled steel scrap. At end of life, the steel subfloor system is assumed to be recycled, with steel recovered through a 100% recycling scenario.
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution levelLess than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs

Data quality assessment

Description of data quality assessment and reference yearsThe data used for this EPD, including product composition, raw material consumption, and manufacturing data, were originally collected by Granab directly from the production sites for the previous EPD and are primarily representative of the 2019 production year. For the 2026 EPD update, these data were reviewed together with Granab and confirmed to remain representative of the current product and manufacturing process. Concerning A1 (upstream raw material production), supplier-specific data from SSAB have been applied for the galvanised steel profiles. The data are based on the Environmental Product Declaration for Metal Coated SSAB Zero™ steel sheets and coils, published according to EN 15804+A2. Generic database data were used for polypropylene (PP) and the steel screws. For the damping element, supplier-specific data based on the EPD for Sylodyn® closed-cell polyurethane elastomer were applied. Generic database data were also used for electricity production and transportation processes. According to the PCR, the data quality assessment shall cover datasets representing at least 80% of the absolute result of each core environmental indicator. Therefore, the assessment was carried out at dataset level for the main raw materials, packaging materials, transport processes and manufacturing activities included in the study. The assessed datasets are considered representative, reliable and appropriate for the goal and scope of the study. Overall, the assessed datasets showed good to very good data quality, with the main environmental contributors represented by supplier-specific EPDs and primary data. Supplier-specific data were used for the galvanized steel profiles and the polyurethane damping element, while manufacturing activities and transport modelling were based on production-specific and primary data. Generic database datasets were applied mainly for minor inputs such as packaging materials, polypropylene and steel screws. All datasets were considered complete, sufficiently precise and consistently modelled according to EN 15804+A2 and PCR 2019:14 requirements. No dataset was rated poor or very poor in terms of geographical, technical or temporal representativeness, including datasets contributing more than 30% to any core environmental indicator.
Data quality assessment
Process nameSource typeSourceReference yearData categoryShare of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3
Steel profiles. galvanisedEPDSSAB Zero™ steel EPD and energy use at Boxholms Profil AB2025/202673% primary data, secondary data49%
PP, support block DatabasePlasticsEurope/GaBi data 2014/2026Secondary data 0%
Steel, expandable screw DatabaseSteel Engineering steel (Worldsteel 2018, EU)2018Secondary data 0%
PUR (damping element)EPDSylodyn® EPD, Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH2025Primary data, secondary data4%
Plastic packagingDatabaseLDPE film (PlasticsEurope 2014 & sphera, EU)2014Secondary data 0%
Steel bandDatabaseSteel Engineering steel (Worldsteel 2018, EU)2018Secondary data 0%
Wood based packagingEPDEPD by Swedish wood 20212021Primary data, secondary data1%
Corrugated boardDatabaseCorrugated board box (Fefco 2018)2018Secondary data 0%
Transport of raw materialsDatabaseGabi/sphera database 2026Primary data4%
Manufacturing of the subfloor systemCollected dataGranab production data from 2019, reviewed and validated in 20262019, validated 2026Primary data2%
Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A360%
The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that supports the use of more primary data to increase the representativeness of and comparability between EPDs. Note that the indicator does not capture all relevant aspects of data quality and is not comparable across product categories.
Comment on the data sources and other information in the tableThe reported share of primary data is associated with uncertainty, as EPD for PUR and Wood based packing used as data source lack information on the share of primary data.
Electricity data
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 (A5 for services)
Type of electricity mixResidual electricity mix on the market
Energy sourcesHydro7.28%
Wind7.75%
Solar28.2%
Biomass7.47%
Geothermal0%
Waste0%
Nuclear32.54%
Natural gas2%
Coal0.08%
Oil1.22%
Peat0%
Other13.78%
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh)0.12 kg CO2 eq./kWh

System boundary

Description of the system boundaryb) Cradle to gate with options, modules C1-C4, module D and with optional modules (A1-A3 + C + D and additional modules).
Excluded modulesNo, there is no excluded module, or there are no excluded modules

Declared modules

Product stageConstruction process stageUse stageEnd of life stageBeyond product life cycle
Raw material supplyTransportManufacturingTransport to siteConstruction installationUseMaintenanceRepairReplacementRefurbishmentOperational energy useOperational water useDe-construction demolitionTransportWaste processingDisposalReuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential
ModuleA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Modules declaredXXXXXNDNDNDNDNDNDNDXXXXX
GeographyFinlandEuropeSwedenSwedenSwedenN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ASwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSweden
Share of specific data60%--------------
Variation - products0%--------------
Variation - sites0%--------------
DisclaimerThe share of specific/primary data and both variations (products and sites) refer to GWP-GHG results only.

Process flow diagram(s) related images

Default scenario

Name of the default scenarioBaseline
Description of the default scenarioThis EPD are assessed to have no significant limitations worth mentioning, since for instance the main materials are based on certified EPDs from the suppliers. The end of life treatment of a small amount of plastic waste (polyethylene: PE) from the core process is assumed to be negligible. It corresponds to 0.003 kg per declared unit (or 0.0015 kg per kg floor system). If applying waste incineration for this plastic waste it would only add about 0.01 kg fossil carbon dioxide (0.003 kg PE *3.1 kg CO2 oer kg PE) which should be within the uncertainty of the final GWP fossil results. The transport to customer (A4) is based on a more or less representative average (400 km by truck) which in reality varies from customer to customer. Transport A4 corresponds to around 2.5% of the GWP-GHG A1-A4. The assumptions made and the data used to model module C are the most uncertain.

Module A4: Transport to the building site

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A4Transport to customer
Brief description of the default scenario in module A4400 km by truck
Description of the default scenario in module A4When declaring the life cycles stages A1-A3 in an EPD, the A4 transport shall not be included. The reason however for including this transport is to be comparable with the Norwegian EPD system, since this transport is required in this EPD system. An average distance of 400 km by truck was estimated by Granab. The fuel mix applied for the truck transport follows the HBEFA 2025 assumptions used in the sphera transport datasets and consists of 84.7% conventional fossil diesel, 3.3% RME and 12.0% HVO on an energy-content basis.
Module A4 informationValueUnit
Distance
400
km
Capacity utilization (including empty returns)
60
%
Bulk density of transported products
Unknown
N/A
Volume capacity utilization factor
(factor: =1 or <1 or ≥1 for compressed or
nested packaged products)
Not applicable
N/A
Fuel type 84.7% conventional fossil diesel, 3.3% RME and 12.0% HVO on an energy-content basis
N/A

Module A5: Installation in the building

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module A5Installation
Brief description of the default scenario in module A5Only biogenic carbon release from wood and cardboard packaging is included in A5
Description of the default scenario in module A5The construction installation stage (A5) has only been included to account for the release of biogenic carbon contained in the packaging materials. The packaging materials consist of corrugated board and wood-based packaging, which contain biogenic carbon. During production, the uptake of biogenic carbon is reported in modules A1-A3. Biogenic carbon stored in the packaging materials is then released in module A5. Waste treatment of packaging materials was considered negligible and therefore excluded from the system boundary. Consequently, no packaging-related energy recovery is modelled in A5. As PERM and PENRM were calculated according to Option B in Annex 3 of PCR 2019:14, the energy content of packaging materials becoming waste in module A5 is not considered useful recovered energy. Consequently, it remains accounted for as energy used as raw material (PERM/PENRM) and is not transferred to PERE/PENRE.

Module C: End-of-life

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module CEnd of life
Brief description of the default scenario in module CEnd-of-life: 100% steel recycling; polymers combusted during steel recycling
Description of the default scenario in module CFor the end of life (module C) generic data has been used to estimate C1 Deconstruction, C2 Transport (150 km by truck), C3 Waste processing. The steel subfloor is considered to end up at steel recycling due to the large content of steel, and before that the product is probably not sorted out into the different material parts. This in turn means that the other materials than steel (polymers) is burned in the electric arc furnace (EAF) when the steel is melted. All steel in the subfloor system is assumed to end up at steel recycling (module C3), corresponding to a 100% recycling scenario. The polymers (PP and PUR) are as mentioned assumed to burn off in the EAF and for the incineration (C3) data (Gabi/sphera) has been applied. This data has been considered as sufficient enough even though based on incineration in a waste incineration plant.

Module D: Beyond product life cycle

Explanatory name of the default scenario in module DNo credit
Brief description of the default scenario in module DNo credit is provided to the recycled steel
Description of the default scenario in module DSince SSAB Zero steel is produced from 100% recycled scrap, no net withdrawal of primary material can be considered avoided through recycling at end of life. Consequently, no credit for recovered steel is assigned in Module D. Since the polymer parts end up together with the product in steel recycling, module D (i.e. credit for generated energy) is not relevant since no “valuable” energy is generated.

Environmental performance

The estimated impact results are only relative statements, which do not indicate the endpoints of the impact categories, exceeding threshold values, safety margins and/or risks.

Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - totalGWP-totalkg CO2 eq.2.45E+05.68E-23.50E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.01E-32.68E-28.53E-10.00E+00.00E+0
Climate change - fossilGWP-fossilkg CO2 eq.2.47E+05.61E-20.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.01E-32.64E-28.53E-10.00E+00.00E+0
Climate change - biogenicGWP-biogenickg CO2 eq.-2.84E-21.50E-43.50E-2NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.08E-67.05E-53.44E-50.00E+00.00E+0
Climate change - land use and land-use changeGWP-luluckg CO2 eq.6.31E-35.61E-40.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND4.32E-62.64E-42.24E-50.00E+00.00E+0
Ozone depletionODPkg CFC-11 eq.5.71E-98.91E-180.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.07E-164.20E-185.25E-140.00E+00.00E+0
AcidificationAPmol H+ eq.1.12E-28.12E-50.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.01E-64.04E-52.67E-40.00E+00.00E+0
Eutrophication aquatic freshwaterEP-freshwaterkg P eq.1.80E-53.46E-70.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.57E-91.63E-72.68E-80.00E+00.00E+0
Eutrophication aquatic marineEP-marinekg N eq.2.51E-32.79E-50.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.51E-61.42E-59.38E-50.00E+00.00E+0
Eutrophication terrestrialEP-terrestrialmol N eq.2.69E-23.50E-40.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.82E-51.77E-41.35E-30.00E+00.00E+0
Photochemical ozone formationPOCPkg NMVOC eq.7.79E-36.52E-50.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND6.63E-63.27E-52.45E-40.00E+00.00E+0
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metalsADP-minerals&metals1kg Sb eq.1.50E-45.20E-90.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND7.36E-112.45E-96.80E-90.00E+00.00E+0
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuelsADP-fossil1MJ, net calorific value4.97E+17.37E-10.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.31E-23.47E-12.58E-10.00E+00.00E+0
Water useWDP1m3 world eq. deprived6.05E-17.44E-40.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND3.50E-63.50E-48.02E-20.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsGWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator

Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Climate change - GWP-GHGGWP-GHG1kg CO2 eq.2.46E+05.68E-20.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.01E-32.68E-28.53E-10.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsGWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.

Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact categoryIndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
Particulate matter emissionsPMDisease incidenceNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Ionizing radiation - human healthIRP1kBq U235 eq.NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Eco-toxicity - freshwaterETP-fw2CTUeNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Human toxicity - cancer effectsHTP-c2CTUhNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Human toxicity - non-cancer effectsHTP-nc2CTUhNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Land-use related impacts/soil qualitySQP2DimensionlessNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
AcronymsPM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).
Disclaimer 1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
Disclaimer 2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator.

Resource use indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
PEREMJ, net calorific value1.97E+16.70E-20.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.09E-43.16E-24.55E-20.00E+00.00E+0
PERMMJ, net calorific value3.61E-10.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PERTMJ, net calorific value2.00E+16.70E-20.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND9.09E-43.16E-24.55E-20.00E+00.00E+0
PENREMJ, net calorific value3.73E+17.38E-10.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.31E-23.48E-12.58E-10.00E+00.00E+0
PENRMMJ, net calorific value1.24E+10.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
PENRTMJ, net calorific value4.97E+17.38E-10.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.31E-23.48E-12.58E-10.00E+00.00E+0
SMkg2.19E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
RSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
NRSFMJ, net calorific value0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
FWm32.03E-28.49E-50.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.65E-74.00E-51.90E-30.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsPERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Waste indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
HWDkg1.28E-54.08E-110.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND5.55E-131.92E-112.83E-110.00E+00.00E+0
NHWDkg2.80E-11.85E-40.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND2.42E-68.71E-51.01E-20.00E+00.00E+0
RWDkg2.68E-31.30E-60.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND1.38E-86.11E-71.18E-50.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsHWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Output flow indicators according to EN 15804

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4D
CRUkg0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
MFRkg1.03E-40.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+01.99E+00.00E+00.00E+0
MERkg6.89E-50.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EEEMJ, net calorific value4.57E-20.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
EETMJ, net calorific value8.26E-20.00E+00.00E+0NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+00.00E+0
AcronymsCRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy.
General disclaimerThe results of the end-of-life stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3/A1-A5 for services).

Abbreviations

EAF = Electric Arc Furnace

EF = Environmental Footprint

EPD = Environmental Product Declaration

GPI = General Programme Instructions

HBEFA = Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport

HDPE = High-Density Polyethylene

HVO = Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil

IBU = Institut Bauen und Umwelt

ISO = International Organization for Standardization

LCA = Life Cycle Assessment

LDPE = Low-Density Polyethylene

LLDPE = Linear Low-Density Polyethylene

ND = Not Declared

PCR = Product Category Rules

PE = Polyethylene

PP = Polypropylene

PU = Polyurethane

PUR = Polyurethane

RME = Rapeseed Methyl Ester

SVHC = Substances of Very High Concern

UN CPC = United Nations Central Product Classification

References

CEN European Committee for Standardisation (2021). EN15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021 (CEN 2021), Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products.

PCR 2019:14 Construction products. Version 2.0.1, date 2025-06-05. EPD International AB, The International EPD® System, http://www.environdec.com/.

Fefco, European Federation of Corrugated Board Manufacturers, European Database for Corrugated Board Life Cycle Studies, 2018.

Gabi/spehra database. The Gabi database 2026.1 was used. 

Gabi LCA software. The Gabi LCA software and corresponding database are provided by spehra in Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany. Gabi version 10 was used.

GPI, General Programme Instructions of the International EPD® System, Version 5.0.

Granab 2026, the company producing the subfloor system studied. The data have been provided by Fredrik Blom.

Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH EPD, Sylodyn® elastomer made of closed-cell polyurethane (PU), Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), EPD-GET-20230472-IBA1-EN, EN 15804+A2, Institut Bauen und Umwelt (IBU), 2025.

HBEFA 2025

ISO (2006a). ISO 14025:2006, Environmental labels and declarations – Type III environmental declarations – Principles and procedures.

ISO (2006b). ISO 14040:2006, Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework.

ISO (2006c). ISO 14044: 2006, Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines.

PlasticsEurope, Association of Plastics Manufacturers, Eco-profiles and Environmental Product Declarations of the European Plastics Manufacturers, High-density Polyethylene (HDPE), Low-density Polyethylene (LDPE), Linear Low-density Polyethylene (LLDPE), PlasticsEurope, April 2014.

Sphera (former thinkstep). The provider of the Gabi LCA software and database.

SSAB EPD, Metal Coated SSAB Zero™ Steel Sheets and Coils, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), EN 15804+A2, The International EPD® System, 2025.

Swedish Wood EPD, Swedish sawn dried timber of spruce or pine, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), registration number S-P-02537, EN 15804+A2, The International EPD® System, 2021.

World Steel Association (worldsteel) is an industry association, with members in every major steel-producing country, representing steel producers, national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes.

 

Version history

Original version of the EPD, 2026-10-02